How are speech and language therapists (SLTs) managing the communication needs of young people with CP: Findings from a recent UK survey

Speech and language therapy for children with CP aims to support the development of effective communication skills. Many clinicians will agree that reducing the speech impairment and improving speech intelligibility will support the child to be part of family, school and community life. However, there is likely to be less consensus regarding how this can be achieved. Rose Watson and Lindsay Pennington think that practices may vary due to differences in health and social care resources as well as uncertainty about which intervention is indeed effective. 

To explore this, they conducted a UK wide online survey asking SLTs about their assessment and intervention practices for communication problems in children and young people with CP, i.e. which problems are commonly addressed, which areas are assessed and how, and which areas are treated and how. The survey was advertised via NHS and RCSLT channels as well as associated social media. Over the course of two months about 300 SLTs replied, of which 265 responses were analysed.

Assessment practices

The responses showed that a wide range of published standardised tests is used to assess including oro-motor function, receptive and expressive language and speech. This shows that children’s communication skills are thoroughly assessed. SLTs also made an effort to individualise assessments where needed. For example, they enlarged pictures or cut them up for children with sensory and/or motor problems. On the other hand, the survey found that non-standardised tests were used as well, which means results cannot be compared to norms. Also, communication skills were sometimes assessed by observation only, which can underestimate children’s abilities.

Intervention practices

Swallowing and receptive language skills were listed by SLTs as the main areas of intervention. Assisted communication, also referred to as AAC, was another intervention priority for them to achieve the aim of communication participation. Again, SLTs used a number of intervention techniques, which is not surprising given the wide and varied range of communication difficulties in children with CP. However, the authors also noted that some of the techniques used are not supported by the literature. This means that in previous studies these techniques were not found to improve communication much.

Overall, the findings show that there is indeed a wide variation in the assessment and intervention of communication difficulties in children with CP. This variation makes it difficult to compare practices across different services. The authors conclude that a set of agreed clinical measures would be a good starting point to inform service development and identify research priorities to move evidence-based practice forward.

Watson, R. M. & Pennington, L. (2015). Assessment and management of the communication difficulties of children with cerebral palsy: a UK survey of SLT practice. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 50(2), 241-259.